" The artistic beauty does not consist of representing a beautiful thing, but of the beautiful representation of one cosa". Emanuel Kant. Dedicated to Humberto Gonzlez. Introduced who me in the world of the art: aesthetic and teratology. To observe, to see, to watch? Which is the correct word or to say it, less indispensable? I do not know it. The unique thing that can be said is that in the hermenutico process that occurs between the spectator and the work of the art at issue, it is of the same nature between the creative act that it connects to the artist with its work.

It is at the end of accounts a very intimate attitude. If, the theory of the art, psychology even, to mention two areas of the knowledge; they deal with " explicar" that process. And they have its validity as far as the argumentative capacity that can develop. Only that stops " educar" ours view and our spirit we must become rich with the artistic proposals. Before explaining something we must understand it and include/understand it. We cannot make the things of inverse way. For my, to have the opportunity to be in front of a picture allows me to connect to me with the possibility of enjoying and of living the beauty: for my it means the possibility of enrichment and creative improvement and an adjectival use necessary not to label some aspect of the life. That is indeed the great difference; an art work lasts in its beauty because it does not represent a fashion, an immediacy necessity. The beauty of the work consists not of adapting or satisfying the aesthetic canons, but of potentialising the spirit of the being. It is more, the creative act looks for and luckyly in the majority of it obtains it to the occasions, to break continuously with the paradigms.

Dispute in new iPhone: HTML5 and Flash Both formats, in summary much, come to be a method to show and to construct to pages Web. We can suppose that HTML5 stops with advantage, because is pure more and is the code with which the own Webs are written. Flash is an addition that allows that laas Webs show things that until recently HTML could not do like videos, animations and effects. HTML5 already is able to even do everything what Flash did, with a greater yield and efficiency, reason why it seems that it will end up prevailing. New iPhone in the beginning of a conflict the war began when Apple in 2007 presented/displayed new iPhone and said not to include Flash in new iPhone by battery saving and yield of the telephone.

It is certain well that Flash is a great consumer of resources, but Apple wants to impose another standard, the HTML5, that although does not belong to him yes that it is going to help to him to overthrow the majority use of Flash of Adobe. Adobe loses a battle with new iPhone HTML5 is outlined like the future at the time of visualizing videos and effects in the Web, but still it has left much route. Apple has bet hard in its new iPhone by the elimination of Flash and the war is ready. It is not very clear which are the intentions of Apple, but without a doubt the elimination of the hegemony of Adobe is an explicit interest. Adobe finishes losing a battle, because it will not make more development of applications of new iPhone with Flash. Nevertheless, Adobe is going to have the support of Google, that has announced that their moving bodies with Android will support Flash. The time will say to us who desire in this war of formats.