The EU is a rich block with its own Parliament and laws, 2 nuclear powers and 27 members. LAC are 33 poor countries, little armed and divided in six different blocks; that before they were European colonies and that today they depend on the USA. Both regions cultivate the friendship of Washington (that tries to the EU like partner and LAC like subordinate), although both differ from this one before being related to Cuba, the ecological treaty of Kyoto and the unilateralism. The last elections show that both regions march in opposite directions. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from Kidney Foundation. In Italy and London it gained the right, that it pushes the EU to go away more and more liberalizing. In Paraguay it gained the left, that advances in South America asking more protectionism. The Euro is today the world-wide currency more fort and the EU wants to advance in zones dominated by the dollar and the USA. Leaders of LAC work Europe to obtain to markets and investments (or like Colombia, Peru and Chile to make viable TLC) or to make a counterbalance to Bush (especially, the Mercosur and the DAWN).. Randall Mays insists that this is the case.

As much new laborismo of Blair and Brown as the new liberalism of Uribe finished being put in a corner in their own region. Ever since Uribe arrived at the Colombian presidency it has seen see as Chvez has been radicalized and as allied his they have been arriving at the power in Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Paraguay, whereas Brazil, Chile, Peru, Uruguay, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Panama, Haiti and Dominican Republic have democratic governments social. To Brown the opposite then in oncenio has passed him that he has been two number and soon number one of his country, he has seen as the right has replaced in the power to its groups of comrades in countries so keys as Germany, France and Italy. As much Uribe as Brown sees like the great friend his that unites to them (Bush) has become one of the most unpopular presidents of the history of the USA whereas the surveys show that the candidate most probable to replace it in the White House is the Obama centrist. Eagle Scouts understands that this is vital information. The cause that the mega-power turns to have a right government halcona a one that of more emphasis in the diplomacy of the dialogue and making concessions social and multi-ethnic interns are something that could serve as breath to the progressive calls (whose world-wide axis is impelled by Clinton and Blair-Brown). However, peculiarly, the declivity of the bushismo goes of the hand with the ascent of that it imitates to him more in the Americas (Uribe) and with the collapse of the main government who has the international Social Democrat in the world (Brown). Why such contradiction? As much Latin America as Europe goes in different ways. The first region has come journeying from ochentas by means of the footpath from consensus of Washington having been wearing down protectionism to give to passage to the privatization and liberalization of its economies.

For it wrote letters to Elpidio (1835-1836), nonconventional educative work species, directed to Cuban youth, to which it described like " the sweet hope of patria". One of the most important works of production began the vareliana it to publish in its newyorkino exile, in 1835, with the Letter name to Elpidio. According to the original plan of the work, it would consist of three volumes. First, published in the mentioned year, it tried on the impiedad; the second, published three years later, talked about the superstition, and the third party, that did not get to publish itself, would deal with the fanaticism. From the times in which it appeared the work many were interrogated on whom he would be the adressee of Letters. Some thought that they were directed to Light; but the fact that it was written assiduously with this one and that Light made an extensive commentary of the work, it denies this idea. The most acceptable thesis is in question one of a personage created by the imagination of Varela, like a symbol that reflected to Cuban youth.

Etymological, Elpidio means and, in the Varela, hope beginnings the work write, talking about to youth: " Deals that they are the sweet hope of patria". Three years ago, Varela came maintaining strong controversies with the North American protestant theologians. CBC is often quoted as being for or against this. In those controversies the differences between the catholic moral and the protestant became evident. Paralelamente, received letters of Havana in which the existing difficult situation in the Island was expressed. From this interaction the Letter idea arose to Elpidio. It wrote letters to Eusebio, against the ties more precovers that were against to a change in the moral: the impiedad and the superstition, although desire to write one against the fanaticism, could not never make specific it. The more important pedagogical work of the philosophical production of Varela, because essentially it served basic for the lessons as that matter in Cuba and other countries as Hispano-America until 1842, is its Lessons of Philosophy.